Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Does Meat Rot In Your Colon? No. What Does? Beans, Grains, and Vegetables!
sp_BlogLink Read the original blog post
May 11, 2012
2:29 am
Avatar
First-Eater
Forum Posts: 2045
Member Since:
February 22, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

iznogud:

The information about GI transit time is linked in the article.  I'm sorry it doesn't support your prejudices.

As far as "digestibility percentage", you can look up PDCAAS values yourself: eggs are 1.0, beef is about 0.92, and wheat and corn are down around 0.25-0.42, depending on type and preparation.  You can do the experiment from the article yourself: eat a steak and some whole corn kernels, and see what comes out the other end: it won't be the steak.

JS

May 17, 2012
5:07 am
Siaip
Guest

Human get 30% energy from cellulose, which is fermented by colon bacteria into short chain fatty acids and when used by human cell t oget energy: (link).

May 17, 2012
2:23 pm
Avatar
First-Eater
Forum Posts: 2045
Member Since:
February 22, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Siaip:

The abstract of that paper neither says nor implies any such thing -- nor do any of the citations of it I can find.  If you know where I can read the full text, please let me know.

As I've said in the article, no animal can digest cellulose natively: to the extent that any animal can use it for energy, it's "fermented" by gut bacteria (e.g. it rots), and the animal absorbs the SCFA and other waste products of fermentation.  

JS

May 17, 2012
8:20 pm
Avatar
Cameron, Tx
Gnoll
Forum Posts: 35
Member Since:
September 24, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Either way you look at it, the body still uses fatty acids as fuel…why else would we have so many different ways to produce/use it?

Btw, I can tell when I'm eating too little fat…I start to crave nuts….

I've been really strict the last few months, buying only grass fed meats from us wellness and I've noticed an upward trend in those cravings.

Not too keen on nuts; I like them, but IMO, they aren't really food for us.

So I've supplemented with pemmican and wild shrimp cooked in tallow….it works!

May 17, 2012
11:09 pm
Philosophy_101
Guest

FALSE!!!!!!!!!!

What vegetarian is making the argument that "humans can't actually digest meat"??
This " Vegetarian propoganda" simply doesn't exsist...I have been around vegetarians since I was born..The reason is simple. Animals are tortured and objectified for our want of consumption (Notice I didn't say need). They are brutalized and sacrificed unwillingly on a genocidal level, yet the majority of us turn a blind eye out of conveniance and wilful ignorance. I'm willing to bet cold hard cash that a meat manufacturer or employee of, is behind this website.. EDUCATE YOURSELF PEOPLE!!! Look at non-Bias documentaries like 'deconstructing dinner' or 'Food Inc.'

May 18, 2012
2:07 am
Avatar
First-Eater
Forum Posts: 2045
Member Since:
February 22, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

DT:

Absolutely.  As I said in Eat Like A Predator, "If you need to eat a can of nuts or a brick of cheese, you didn’t eat enough meat."  I should amend that to "fatty meat".

I'm convinced this is why so many people trying to eat mainstream "healthy diets" crave cheese: they're badly deficient in both protein and saturated fat. 

P101:

The "meat rots in your colon" claim is widespread -- and it was even made on Oprah's website by Dr. Oz, last time I checked!  I wouldn't have written the article if it weren't such a common myth.

Meanwhile, please don't move the goalposts: the ethics of meat-eating are a separate issue.  And being the sole proprietor of this website, I'll take your bet for as much money as you have to wager. 

(Frankly, I'd love to be sponsored by a producer of grass-finished beef: it would certainly decrease my food budget!  Any CA or NV rancher interested in trading advertising space on gnolls.org in return for grass-finished beef should contact me.)

JS

May 19, 2012
1:42 pm
Againstthegrain
Guest

Last year I inadvertently experienced a lengthy experiment that further convinced me that meat is *much* easier to digest than plant material.

At the late age of 49, I spent 15 mos in orthodontic treatment. I didn't chicken out with Invisalign, either - I had "train-track" brackets & titanium arch broadening wires to correct my narrow & crowded almost V-shaped arches into much broader U shapes.

Needless to say, there were plenty of reasons it wasn't fun turning 50 yoa with braces, and I had to make many adjustments to my cooking and meal choices to accommodate a sensitive mouth and teeth, etc., while at the same time, make sure that I was eating very well so that my middle-aged approaching menopause jaw bones would have the necessary nutrients to remodel and retain the teeth that were being moved to the extreme edges of my arch capacity.

In the first few weeks of having braces and every month or so after I'd had an arch wire or ligature adjustment, my teeth felt quite loose and very tender, so I either ate really soft ground, pureed, or practically liquid food, or I ate solid food that could be easily mashed & swallowed without much chewing. Throughout my time in braces, I *never* had a problem digesting meat, seafood, poultry, dairy, and fats, even when I swallowed chunks of unchewed meat or barely mashed it with minimal chewing (I did make sure to cut firm meat into fairly small pieces to minimize choking risk). The ability to digest meat didn't seem to depend on either texture or degree of cooking, thought that did make a difference in my comfort while eating and chewing.

But for about 7 or or 8 months, whenever I tried to eat vegetables, I either minimized vegetable ingestion or else I had to either cook them to the point of being disgustingly soft & mushy or pureed with a blender. It wasn't just for eating and chewing comfort, either. If I prepared vegetables the way I prefer (raw or lightly cooked, aka al dente), my abdomen "talked" to me for hours after a meal, evidently trying extra hard to break down the vegetables. I wasn't in pain or particularly uncomfortable, but the obvious and continual churning, rumbling, and somewhat increased gas production from barely chewed vegetables was very annoying and interfered with good sleep for both myself and my husband (he could hear the rumbling and gurgling noises).

Salad greens were the worst to eat, because it was *very* hard to chew the thin leaves efficiently so they took a ridiculous amount of effort and time to consume, and they created the most abdominal noise and churning sensation. I love having a big salad with my dinner, so initially I tried swallowing salad without much chewing, but that created a far worse choking hazard than swallowing unchewed meat (the leaves would act like plastic cling wrap & stick at the back of the mouth or top of the esophagus). For the first 7 mos with braces I mostly gave up on raw and chunky vegetables and salads. When I ate vegetables, I either cooked them until very soft and/or blenderized them to make up for my inability to chew well, or I limited myself to just a few small bites.

If I had any doubt about the difference in digestibility between meat and plant foods, I don't now.

May 19, 2012
1:58 pm
Avatar
Halifax, UK
Gnoll
Forum Posts: 364
Member Since:
June 5, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

ATG - Your story is really very interesting. I find the most digestible meals to be some kind of red meat and little else. My wife is not so much the carnivore, but we both enjoy certain cuts of beef with little else. Interesting read - thank you for posting it.

Living in the Ice Age
http://livingintheiceage.pjgh.co.uk

May 19, 2012
2:37 pm
Avatar
First-Eater
Forum Posts: 2045
Member Since:
February 22, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

ATG:

Your story makes biochemical sense.  In order to digest vegetable matter, we need to chew it well in order to break down the cellulose, which forms the cell walls of green plants --

-- and which we can't digest.  Otherwise the nutrients we can digest are trapped within the cells, and digestive distress results as our stomachs and small intestine try (and fail) to break down the cellulose.

That's why long cooking, pureeing, or juicing vegetables allowed you to eat them -- it broke down the cellulose where your teeth couldn't.

Thanks for sharing!

JS

May 19, 2012
8:05 pm
Avatar
Cameron, Tx
Gnoll
Forum Posts: 35
Member Since:
September 24, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

JS: this is precisely why corn terrifies me so much:

No matter how much you chew it, it still comes out whole....

WTF IS UP WITH CORN?!?!?!?!?

May 20, 2012
1:19 pm
cobalamin
Guest

J. Stanton:

I've been experimenting and I'm going to point out the errors in the logic.

You've never been Vegan for at least a year. A vegetarian's gut flora is similar to a meat-eaters gut flora, as in harboring more harmful bacteria than beneficial bacteria and a lot different than a Vegan's gut flora, as in, a Vegan harbors very little harmful bacteria and a lot of beneficial bacteria. Vegetarians have levels of protease enzymes close to those of meat-eaters, going from Vegetarian to eating meat is not a big leap in noticing what rots and what doesn't.

As a vegan that has been vegan for over 3 years, I decided to test cooked meat, raw meat, cooked fish and raw fish.

Cooked meat: I experienced a serious immune system response, my body did not want the cooked meat, right away it exited my stomach where it was dumped in my GI tract to rot, major gas and abdominal pain.

Raw meat: Digested beautifully however my armpits and feces stank the day after.

Cooked fish: Digested fine however I woke up with a small ball of snot in my throat. Very small immune system response.

Raw fish: Digested beautifully however my armpits and feces stank the day after.

For me, meat is for survival and nothing else since I know how we humans produce large quantities of Vitamin B12. So.. There isn't anything needed in meat that can come from vegetation and that we can easily produce ourselves.

I've never had grains and vegetables rot in my GI tract, only beans at the beginning of going Vegan from being a meat-eater, not anymore. My guess is that a meat-eater/vegetarian moving from their current diet onto a Vegan diet will experience gas at first as the gut flora changes, harmful bacteria dying off and GI tract getting cleaned up from the processed animal products and/or cooked flesh. Grains should be avoided because of the anti-nutrients and the damage they cause on the brain.

We aren't herbivores, omnivores or carnivores. We are frugivorous apes that should be butt naked and barefoot in the tropics.

May 21, 2012
11:05 pm
Avatar
First-Eater
Forum Posts: 2045
Member Since:
February 22, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Daniel:

The reason corn ends up in poop is because the outer shell of a corn kernel is made of cellulose, which we can't digest.

cobalamin:

Before I get into the disagreements, I'd like to note that we agree on the grain issue -- and I'm sure we also agree that massive subsidies for monocropped GMO grains are both unhealthy and incredibly destructive to our environment.  

Furthermore, while I'm not a raw foodist, "raw vegan + meat/fish/eggs" is a very healthy Paleo variant...and in general, I think foods that can be eaten raw (even if they typically aren't) are better for us that foods that require processing.  I sear the outside of my steaks and roasts for flavor, but I prefer the rest bleu...and I'll never turn down good sashimi, or a delicious baby green salad.

That being said:

"We aren't herbivores, omnivores or carnivores. We are frugivorous apes that should be butt naked and barefoot in the tropics."

While there's absolutely nothing wrong with being butt-naked and barefoot in the tropics, we haven't been frugivorous for at least six million years.  Furthermore, our (partially) frugivorous ancestors were quadrupedal tree-climbers with tiny 300-350cc brains, limited to dwelling in the tropical forests that provided them with ripe fruit.  

(For those interested in what the fossil record tells us of the history of hominin evolution and diet, I've been exploring it at length in my series Big Brains Require An Explanation.)

As for myself, I prefer bipedalism and my big 1300cc+ brain -- which gives me the ability to make and use tools so that I can live somewhere besides malaria, leech, and parasite-ridden tropical forests.  Plus, there's no skiing in Equatorial Africa, and I prefer living in mountains -- such as these andthese.

"For me, meat is for survival and nothing else since I know how we humans produce large quantities of Vitamin B12. So.. There isn't anything needed in meat that can come from vegetation and that we can easily produce ourselves."

Your facts aren't straight.  No animal produces vitamin B12!  Only bacteria produce it.  Ironically, while gut bacteria produce some quantity of B12, it's not absorbed through the colon, so the only way to get it (besides eating animal products) is to eat your own poop -- a practice I can't recommend unless you are a rabbit or other cecotrope.

(Ruminants, such as cattle, goats, and sheep, barf up and redigest vegetation that's been fermented by bacteria in their rumen, so they can actually absorb the B12 their own bacteria are producing.)

 

Moving on: the balance of gut flora does tend to adapt over time to one's diet -- so any rapid shifts in diet can cause GI distress.  Furthermore, those who haven't eaten meat for a long time can suffer from an insufficiently acid stomach.  Ordinarily, meat stimulates the secretion of additional gastric acid (which improves the digestion of anything eaten with it) -- but it can take some time for longtime veg*ans to re-adapt.  HCl supplements can be helpful, as can a few tbsp of vinegar taken with the meal.

JS

May 28, 2012
1:55 pm
Briann
Guest

I have been reading that if we eat too high of a protein diet we get sick...our kidneys will fail and we get diarrhea and things like that..I am aware that we do not digest the fibers in non meat foods but I am pretty sure that we do get some of the vitamin benefits from the vegetable matter foods as no one runs around with skurvy these days and it is my understanding that meat is a poor source of vitaman c.

I am not personally going for a zero residue diet. I am more than happy to poop out fibers and inedibles and toxins.

Also beans do not make me gassy but man some of the asian cooking products sure do. No fish sauce for me.

So I am sticking to meat, veggies, some dairy and some fruit. Do not try to convince me that a strawberry is toxic lol.

May 29, 2012
12:51 am
Avatar
First-Eater
Forum Posts: 2045
Member Since:
February 22, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Briann:

The "protein damages your kidneys" myth is another widespread piece of propaganda with no backing to it...I should write an article about it!  

It is true that we can't live indefinitely on a 100% protein diet...our livers can only convert so much protein to glucose each day, and our cells aren't very efficient at using it directly for energy AFAIK.  It's called "rabbit starvation", and though it's a very effective weight loss plan (see: the Velocity Diet), we need fat and/or carbohydrate to make up the bulk of our daily energy needs.

In real life, however, protein is extremely satiating -- so it's very difficult to eat more of it than our bodies need unless we're making lots of protein shakes.  And our kidneys are more likely to excrete the incomplete proteins from grains than the complete proteins in meat, eggs, and dairy: if we're short on any one of the twenty essential amino acids, the rest are either converted to glucose or excreted.

Also, as I said in the article, "I am not arguing that we should never eat vegetables: I’m just busting a silly myth."  I actually eat far more vegetables than I used to before going paleo!  However, I don't do it because I'm afraid of damaging my kidneys, peeing out my bones, or any of the other bizarre anti-meat myths out there.  I do it because some of them taste good.  

Summary: we're not arguing.  Keep doing what you're doing.

JS

May 29, 2012
1:52 pm
Sybal Janssen
Guest

I lean a little bit toward the idea of a diet that consists of animal protein, vegetables and a fairly high fat content that includes animal fat - providing those animals are grazed on grass and fed with ground up animal carcasses. Yet I take issue with the idea that the so called paleo diet represents the diet of early man. Even with modern weapons, hunting an animal for food hard work, particularly in the winter and early spring. Those animals that our early forefathers did manage to kill were thin and filled with parasites. I suspect that early man fed himself on roots and grubs far more consistently than he fed himself on meat. Except for those animals killed in summer when forage was plentiful, the amount of fat on an animal would be skimpy at best. The chances of overindulging on fat in prehistoric days would be few and far between. Quite frankly the Paleo Diet in and of itself is a diet that is only feasible in a country that is wealthy enough in terms of open space and grasslands to support an abundance of meat animals. It is also only possible in a society where agricultural practices restrain the growth of parasites, while promoting a relative amount of cleanliness in the packing houses. Also, if it is true that the formidable armies of ancient Rome primarily subsisted on rations of grain that they ground daily with their portable mills, then a high protein diet is not necessarily the best option for all peoples.

May 30, 2012
4:04 pm
Avatar
First-Eater
Forum Posts: 2045
Member Since:
February 22, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Sybal:

"I take issue with the idea that the so called paleo diet represents the diet of early man. Even with modern weapons, hunting an animal for food hard work, particularly in the winter and early spring. Those animals that our early forefathers did manage to kill were thin and filled with parasites. I suspect that early man fed himself on roots and grubs far more consistently than he fed himself on meat. Except for those animals killed in summer when forage was plentiful, the amount of fat on an animal would be skimpy at best. The chances of overindulging on fat in prehistoric days would be few and far between."

What evidence do you have for that theory?  I'm going through the archaeology of ancestral diet right now, in this series of articles...and I long ago debunked the idea that our more recent ancestors (caribou hunters ~30 KYa) ate a diet of lean protein, here.  

"Quite frankly the Paleo Diet in and of itself is a diet that is only feasible in a country that is wealthy enough in terms of open space and grasslands to support an abundance of meat animals."

That's true.

However, if you're running a zoo and someone tells you "We don't have the budget to feed meat to all those lions...let's feed them corn instead," you would rightly say "Then we have too many lions in the zoo."  The same holds true for the world: if we can't feed humans a diet that keeps us healthy and fit, then there are too many of us.  

Before we get too excited about the consequences, though, it's very important to note that industrial agriculture, such as we practice now, is completely unsustainable, depending on massive inputs of fossil fuel via the Haber process and using up topsoil at roughly 1% per year...and that while less than 20% of the US is arable, ruminants can graze sustainably nearly anywhere.

"If it is true that the formidable armies of ancient Rome primarily subsisted on rations of grain that they ground daily with their portable mills, then a high protein diet is not necessarily the best option for all peoples."

I hope you're not using the diets of conquering armies -- who eat by confiscating whatever their victims are growing or herding -- as an template for human health.  Do you have data showing that soldiers in the Roman army somehow outlived their contemporaries?  (I thought not.)

JS

June 1, 2012
5:30 pm
Kimberly
Guest

Do you have a post on the ethics of meat eating? I haven't thoroughly investigated the page yet actually, but I did not see one. I have just read through the last years worth of comments on the subject, and I think the ethics do play a part in the discussion IF you are a vegetarian or vegan. I have been a strict vegetarian for four years. (No meat ("nothing with a face") dairy or eggs. My primary reason for being vegetarian is that once I realized what was taking place within the mass factory farm situations, I chose to not be part of it. It is that plain and simple. I have two daughters, one is a vegetarian and one is not. I still cook meat for my non veggie girl...but I have a hard time doing it. I don't try to push the health benefits of being vegetarian...it IS more difficult than eating very readily available meat...but I do feel that if more people were aware of what actually took place behind the scenes there would be more people that did not include meat in their diet. I don't know if I am better off, but I have never had any of the problems associated with eating a vegetarian only diet that some of the posts here talked about. My cholesteral is very low and my blood pressure is great too at 46...and I feel better since I stopped with the animals. So, anyway, I would be very interested to see a post related to the ethics behind animal consumption...I think it would be interesting and, of course, more specific since this started truly in regard to the issue of the "rotting food". I do feel though that the majority of people "for" eating meat that would post would be the McDonald's burger and nuggets folks that really just don't care and turn away from what is unpleasant. I feel like so many people in the above posts are so negative in regard to vegetarians which I just don't get! They were so excited to have some kind of information that they could re-post on their facebook pages next to a picture of them eating a steak or a bucket of KFC...they weren't really concerned with the health issues or the digestion (which you were pointing out) but just that someone made it okay for them to not feel bad about eating it. Anyway...more than I originally meant to say...it was an interesting hour...

June 3, 2012
3:57 am
john j.
Guest

never in a million years would i eat cows,pigs,chickens, ive been vegan for 10 years and have energy and run marathons and in good health just like my doctor is. all you people that have excuses why animals should have to suffer for your tste buds and diets, why dont you get a taste of your own medicine and be slaughtered yourself.
dead animal carcas is not meant for human bodies or else we would eat it raw like lions and then we would start eatin gdogs and cats, but thankfully some people still have hearts on planet earth and are trying to spraed the word you dont have to eat rotten flesh to be healthy, most of these commenters are meat/dairy industry thugs who are the murderers of these animals. go to peta.org like i did and see the truth about the crap youre eating. factory farming is the number 1 cause of air pollution and greenhouse gases so youre taste buds is murdering animals and destroying planet earth. and yes grains and beans may be indigestible, but the answer is not eating cows and pigs, there are sick people out there.

June 3, 2012
2:42 pm
Avatar
First-Eater
Forum Posts: 2045
Member Since:
February 22, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Kimberley:

I haven't spent much time on the ethics of meat-eating, because it's been covered so ably by people like Simon Fairlie in Meat: A Benign Extravagance and Lierre Keith in The Vegetarian Myth.  However, there are a few important facts to keep in mind:

1. Our ancestors were definitely eating meat since 3.4 million years ago, and probably since before our split with the ancestors of chimpanzees and bonobos (who also eat meat) 6-7 million years ago.  Meat-eating is natural behavior for humans.

2. Animals and animal products are a necessary part of the cycle of life.  Industrial, chemical fertilizer and pesticide-based monocropping (usually of GMO grains) is an unsustainable environmental disaster whether we feed the result to cattle, to pigs, or to people.  As I wrote previously:

"Even worse, industrial grain production impoverishes our farmers, destroys our soil and our water, and leaves barren landsalt flats, and dead ocean deltas in its wake. It demands unimaginable amounts of fossil fuels to create nitrogen fertilizer, toxic herbicides and pesticides, and giant sowing and harvesting machines, and to transport the grain from the Midwest to where people actually live. It demands giant, river-killing dams to fill irrigation canals. It strip-mines fossil water, pumped fromunderground aquifiers that took millions of years to fill—all to grow corn, wheat, and soybeans on land best suited for grazing livestock on perennial grasses.  (Did you know that 3-5% of world natural gas production—1-2% of the entire world energy supply—is required just to make ammonium nitrate fertilizer? No, that’s not a misprint.)

And just to choose the most ironically named example, the “Fertile Crescent” is mostly barren desert—denuded forever by the agriculture that was invented there, and once flourished there. (It covers regions of modern-day Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Palestine and Syria…countries known for being desert wastelands.)  In short, industrial agriculture is an unmitigated environmental catastrophe."

3. Paleo emphasizes the consumption of grass-finished, sustainably raised meat.  It's better for us, and better for the Earth.  Grain isn't the natural diet of cattle any more than it is ours.

In summary, we both agree that industrial food production is destructive.  However, there are many options for sustainable consumption of animals and animal products.  eatwild.com is a good place to start looking for local providers.

That being said, if you still can't bear to eat anything with a face, that's your choice, which I respect: I was a vegetarian once.  However, I submit that it's a learned, cultural response based on our industrial food system keeping us insulated from the realities of production, not anything innate.  In real life, unlike children's books, cattle aren't cute: they're big and dumb and smell like poop.  

And while this doesn't excuse wanton cruelty, all anyone has to do is watch a few Youtube videos of starving wildebeest or Cape buffalo being eaten alive by lions, hyenas, and wild dogs to realize that being fed for your whole life, protected from predators your whole life, and then killed instantly by being shot in the head maybe isn't so inhumane after all.

 

john j:

Read my answer above.

 

JS

June 5, 2012
5:02 am
C-Dan
Guest

A discussion on health comes later.
Will I be able to eat human meat? yes. Will human meat rot in my colon? no.
What qualifies us for eating animals? Intellect? cognition? level of consciousness? Physical superiority?
I don't eat retarded humans. I don't eat weaker humans. If the criteria for eating from the animal kingdom was "survival of the fittest", me being in the top 1% of the human population when it comes to height and IQ (despite the rotting grains in my intestines) could pose as a predator to 99% of the human population apart from the rest of animal kingdom and would be vulnerable to few.. that would be a good deal, wouldn't it?
Why don't I exercise my superiority? Because I DO NOT want others to do that to me.
If there were a wiser, stronger species on earth, I would want it to let me be.

What Veganism is : It is a way of life. You don't cannibalize, you derive nutrition and resources from way down in the consciousness food chain.

Which option appeals to you? -
I eat an apple from an apple tree, I let the apple tree be, I take the apple seeds and plant them for more trees.
vs
I feed a cow, jail it forever, impregnate it over and over again, drain its milk, slay its calf and finally when the cow can no longer give milk, slay it too.

Let's keep this aside.
Let's take the article you had linked to. I can provide 10,000 counter studies. What difference does it make?
I can tell you about studies which show vegans and vegetarians have always had a better IQ than their non-vegan counterparts. I can give examples of people getting rid of their diseases after turning vegan etc etc.
But all that's numbers and secondary.

What's primary?
That you were able to post here and get a reply from me. To comprehend that reply, to have the time to absorb it without someone having planned your death as soon as you were born.
To be able to respond to me again without being physically harmed.
The freedom is primary.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 183

Currently Online:
4 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1764

Members: 5339

Moderators: 0

Admins: 1

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 2

Topics: 250

Posts: 7102

Administrators: J. Stanton: 2045