• Your life and health are your own responsibility.
• Your decisions to act (or not act) based on information or advice anyone provides you—including me—are your own responsibility.


Hunters Must Have Been Smart, They Invented Agriculture: A Review of Jack Brink’s “Imagining Head-Smashed-In” and George Frison’s “Survival By Hunting”

Imagining Head-Smashed-In, by Jack W. Brink

Imagining Head-Smashed-In,
by Jack W. Brink

One of the primary conceits of history is that nothing happened before agriculture. The Great Leap Forward! Between the Tigris and the Euphrates, the cradle of civilization! Page 1 of any sixth-grade world history textbook.

And before that?

Nothing, as far as we’re told. Unremitting savagery, a life nasty, brutish, and short, cavemen killing each other with clubs and dragging women by the hair. A life not worth a chapter, or even a page, to describe it.

Yet an awkward fact remains: these ‘savages’ were modern humans. In fact, they were taller, stronger, healthier, had larger brains and better teeth, and were longer-lived than the farmers that replaced them (see: Jared Diamond, Claire Cassidy).

And somehow these ‘savages’ managed to invent agriculture—a task much more difficult than practicing it. They discovered how and when to sow. They discovered how to plow, how to weed, how to protect crops against birds and rodents, how to harvest and thresh and grind and cook and bake…a suite of tasks that remained essentially unchanged for 10,000 years after their original discovery.

In other words, those ‘savages’ must have been pretty damned smart.

But how did they become so smart? It can’t have had anything to do with agriculture or anything we consider ‘civilized’, because they invented all that. What caused little 65-pound savanna apes with 350cc brains to evolve into Late Paleolithic modern humans with 1500cc brains?

Clearly there was much more to Paleolithic life than dumb savagery.

I will now turn this essay over to Jack W. Brink, archaeologist and author of “Imagining Head-Smashed-In: Aboriginal Buffalo Hunting on the Northern Plains.” From the Preface:

The book isn’t about what are traditionally considered the great historic achievements of our species. There are no magnificent cities built, no colossal monuments erected, no gigantic statues carved, no kingdoms conquered. It was very much this deviation from classical concepts of “civilization” that motivated me to write this book. Modern society seems to equate human achievement with monumental substance and architectural grandeur. Asked to name the greatest accomplishments of ancient cultures you would certainly hear of the Great Wall of China, Stonehenge, the Great Pyramids, and the civilizations that ruled Greece and Rome. Shunted off to the side are many ancient cultures that achieved greatness through their skill, knowledge, and ingenuity – cultures that managed to survive in demanding environments for extraordinary lengths of time without leaving towering monuments to themselves. In the coming pages I hope to show how simple lines of rocks stretching across the prairies are every bit as inspirational as rocks piled up in the shape of a pyramid.

This is a book about one of the truly remarkable accomplishments in human history. It is the story of an unheralded, unassuming, almost anonymous group of people who hunted for a living. They occupied an open, windswept, often featureless tract of land. They lived in conical skin tents that they lugged around with them in their search for food. A life of nearly constant motion negated permanent villages and cumbersome material possessions. They shared this immense landscape with herds of a wild and powerful beast – the largest animal on the continent. In a land virtually without limits, people of seemingly unsophisticated hunting societies managed to direct huge herds of buffalo to pinpoint destinations where ancient knowledge and spiritual guidance taught them massive kills could be achieved. It was an that guaranteed survival of the people for months to come, a that ensured their existence for millennia. Using their skill and their astonishing knowledge of bison biology and behaviour, bands of hunters drove great herds of buffalo over steep cliffs and into wooden corrals. In the blink of an eye they obtained more food in a single moment than any other people in human history. How they accomplished this is a story as breathtaking in scope and complexity as the country in which the events unfolded.

What follows is a fusion of archaeology and narrative, as Brink attempts to reconstruct the details of a buffalo jump—an event that last occurred in the 1800s, far outside anyone’s living memory. As he puts it:

Head-Smashed-In Buffalo Jump in southern Alberta, Canada, is but one of many places where herds of bison were brought to their deaths by the Native inhabitants of the Plains. It forms the nucleus around which my story unfolds. But this is not so much the story of one place, one people, or one time. It is the story of countless people who thrived over an enormous expanse of time and territory by orchestrating mass kills of bison. There were two reasons I wanted to write this book. First, to bring to a wider audience a story that I felt was so compelling and inspirational that it should not be allowed to fade from contemporary memory. And second, to do justice to the people who orchestrated these remarkable events.

The text of “Imagining Head-Smashed-In” runs to over 300 pages, which should be our first clue that this was not a trivial task. Indeed, reading it gives a nearly vertiginous sense of the skill, ingenuity, and sheer tenacity required to survive in the extreme environment of the Northern Great Plains. What we modern humans think of as “wilderness survival” basically consists of avoiding immediate death until someone in a helicopter rescues us—or, worst case, walking in one direction until we reach the safety and familiar problems of ‘civilization’, which is to say: other people. Obtaining food is not a concern, because humans can survive several weeks without food: ‘wilderness survival’ is a temporary state of privation, to be escaped as quickly as possible.

Yet for millions of years—the entire span of time and circumstances that shaped us from small, dumb apes into modern humans—daily life was far more challenging that what we think of today as ‘wilderness survival’. The problems of everyday life could not be postponed until we reached a hospital, a supermarket, or even a paved road—and they had to be addressed without maps, compasses, Gore-Tex, matches, or even a metal knife. Sickness, injury, and childbirth. Freezing cold, searing heat, pouring rain. And the continual, omnipresent drive of all life: hunger. The need to eat something nutritious so that you have the energy to live one more week, one more day, one more hour.

Yet Paleolithic humans met that challenge and mastered it—for we spread out of Africa and around the entire world, even to the smallest, most isolated Pacific islands. We survived in humid jungles and parched deserts, in howling blizzards and torrential downpours, on prairies and forests and valleys and mountains and beaches and anywhere there was living flesh for us to kill and eat. And we were such accomplished hunters and killers and eaters that we drove most of the big, slow animals to extinction.

Pyramids, in contrast, are uninteresting. All you need is tens of thousands of slaves to stack rocks until they die. Hunting is the real human history. Yet since it left behind nothing but stone points and bones smashed open for marrow, its stories are lost to us forever. All we can do is imagine.

And that is what Jack Brink does for us: he imagines one of the uncountable stories of the real human history.

Who could imagine that a book of North American archaeology could leave me near tears?

“Imagining Head-Smashed-In” is available directly from Athabasca University Press in hardback, paperback, and as a free Creative Commons-licensed PDF, or from Amazon.com.

Thanks to Tim Rangitsch (@acmebike, Acme Bicycles) for bringing this book to my attention.

Survival by Hunting, by George Frison

Survival by Hunting,
by George Frison

While “Imagining Head-Smashed-In” creates a strangely poignant narrative out of archeology, George Frison’s “Survival By Hunting” is a far more utilitarian book. If IHSA is a beautifully-constructed diorama in the museum located at the jump site, “Survival By Hunting” is one of the shovels used at the dig.

Just as IHSA is a combination of archaeology and narrative reconstruction, “Survival by Hunting” is a combination of archaeology and biography. Frison briefly tells his story as a child growing up in rural Wyoming on his grandfather’s ranch, and of both the culture and essential privation (he grew up during the Depression) that led to becoming a subsistence hunter at a young age. As a hunter he found many tools and traces of the Native American hunters who had previously inhabited the area, hunting the same game he had. An abiding interest in these remains led to a career in archaeology, which combines with his decades of experience hunting large animals to make him the leading authority on Prehistoric hunting techniques.

Though written very dryly, the book is an entertaining combination of factual academic recountings of artifact sites and his own personal experience. Instead of simply speculating how prehistoric hunters might have butchered mammoths with stone tools, Frison flies to Africa and tries it himself on an elephant carcass culled from a nature reserve—proving that stone tools are indeed sufficient to the task of cutting through elephant hide. And not content to guess at the force of a dart or spear thrown by an atlatl (spear-thrower) and whether it might be sufficient to kill a mammoth, he learns to make them himself—and tests them, again on an elephant carcass. Only someone with Frison’s experience at real-life game hunting, and Frison’s willingness to test his theories by experiment, could accumulate the knowledge he does—let alone assemble it into charmingly tentative hypotheses about the nature and significance of an archaeological site.

Reading “Survival by Hunting” is a bit like being on an dig oneself: startling artifacts of knowledge are strewn randomly about the narrative, often covered with dirt and mentioned only in passing. For instance:

Woodruff said that during the last half of the nineteenth century, [mountain] sheep were so plentiful that any time they were short of meat they hitched up a wagon, drove along the base of the steep east slope of the Absaroka Mountains, and loaded the wagon with sheep as they were shot and rolled to the bottom.

This offhand anecdote provides a glimpse of the cornucopia that must have been pre-contact North America, even after thousands of years of Native American hunting and subsequent extinctions. In contrast, our few remaining scraps of modern ‘wilderness’ are, for the most part, beautiful but lifeless high-altitude tundra. And hunting today is either completely prohibited or carefully managed, with thousands of would-be hunters vying for a tiny number of tags handed out by lottery—those tags costing many times in excess of the value of the meat.

As the book progresses, we learn that an elk antler tip can serve as an atlatl hook; that bison can squeeze through openings which cattle cannot; that pronghorn can run at over 45 MPH but refuse to jump or crash through a flimsy ‘fence’ made of brush; and hundreds of other small knowledge artifacts that only assemble themselves into a coherent whole in retrospect and upon reflection.

To summarize “Survival by Hunting”, I’ll quote the Preface:

Equally disturbing to me is the attitude students are acquiring towards hunting…students questioned about animal procurement strategies commonly respond, “When they got hungry, someone would kill a bison or whatever other animal was selected as the target for the day and bring it back to camp.” I believe such interpretations to be totally inadequate, and I hope that the contents of this book convince others of the vast reservoir of learned behavior involved in hunting.

All I have to say is: what George said.

(His criticism can be applied equally to many archaeologists, whose ignorance of basic physics, let alone hunting strategies, is blatantly obvious—but that’s another article for another time.)

“Survival by Hunting” may not have the grand narrative scope of “Imagining Head-Smashed-In”. But if you want to understand another tiny fragment of the real human history—which is how Plains hunters managed to kill mammoths, bison, and antelope on foot, using only sharp rocks and their wits—this book will get you there.

You can buy “Survival by Hunting” directly from the UC press, or at a discount from Amazon.com. (Sorry, no free PDF for this one.)

Live in freedom, live in beauty.


Did you enjoy this article? Don’t forget to share it—the buttons below make it easy.

You might also enjoy “How Glaciers Might Have Made Us Human” and “When The Conclusions Don’t Match The Headlines: Darwin Is Still Right“.

Bookmark and Share


Permalink: Hunters Must Have Been Smart, They Invented Agriculture: A Review of Jack Brink’s “Imagining Head-Smashed-In” and George Frison’s “Survival By Hunting”
  • Cornelius


    Thanks again for another great article. I would just like to point out a couple of things, however. You mention illness regarding us Indians as hunter-gatherers. Illness was actually rarely a problem for my ancestors. Things like obesity, diabetes, heart disease, cancer, and so on were unknown, as they didn’t have the modern day poisonous western diet to contend with. My ancestors ate healthy food; mostly buffalo organs and fat. Most of the actual meat (muscle) they would dry into jerky and save for later. They also didn’t live in today’s antiseptic environment, with anti-bacterial wipes, soaps, over-prescribed antibiotics, and so on. Their immune systems were kept strong by regularly being challenged, and illness was usually either avoided or quite serious. It was pretty much either-or. Either you got a life-threatening illness, or you were healthy. Illnesses were very rare, though. (At least before the Europeans showed up) By far most premature deaths were caused by injury.

    On a less local level, of course knives made from flint, obsidian, or other stone suitable for knapping would not only be able to cut through elephant hide, but could do so easily. Such knives can have edges that are only a molecule thick or so, and are usually much sharper and harder than the sharpest of modern steel blades. Their only problem, of course, is that they are brittle, but handled properly they will make short work of the toughest of hides. Skilled knappers made blades for every purpose, from basic butchery to skinning and flensing. For those people who doubt this, they only need think of how sharp the edges of shattered glass are. Same thing. Wicked sharp.

    I really don’t mean to argue with you at every turn here. It just seemed to me that since you were asserting that my ancestors weren’t quite as dumb as some people seem to think, you might want to have a couple additional facts.

    I really do like your articles. Please keep up the good work. Who knows, you might even save a life or two along the way. If even one is saved, it is all worth it.



  • Bodhi

    Thanks for bringing these books to our attention and reviewing them. They look like they would be interesting reads. I think we are now more than ever becoming interested in hunter-gathers and educating ourselves about them. The discovery of Gobekli Tepe is helping to change the view of the paleolithic era. I hope that more site like it will be discover.


  • Tim

    Great reviews. I actually had 2 courses with Dr Frison at UWyo. Wish I’d had this “paleo” world view then! I live in the Black Hills of SD, most recently Lakota lands, and there are a few mass-kill sites of bison within an easy drive. I will be paying those a visit and using a different view to the details having read these works.

    The great “Mammoth Site” is just an hour away as well, but I don’t think human cut marks have been found on bones there, still neat to see mammoth bones.

    As it is 20 below here today, I was reflecting what a well-supplied aboriginal camp might be like right now. Pretty good living I’d think.

  • Tweets that mention

    […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Tim Rangitsch, Kenneth Younger III. Kenneth Younger III said: Hunters Must Have Been Smart, They Invented Agriculture: A Review of “Imagining Head-Smashed-In” & “Survival By Hunting” – http://sfoc.us/6a […]

  • Cornelius:

    Diseases of civilization are a whole another topic…and that's one reason we're here, yes?  To figure out how to live in 'civilization' without suffering the negative consequences, mostly of unrestrained overindulgence?

    As far as obsidian, yes, it's the best knife material…but I think the problem is that it's not very common.  Most places you're lucky to find an exposed outcropping of flint or chert, and even they are few and far between in landscapes dominated by sandstone and limestone.  One of Frison's findings was that a typical stone biface would cut elephant hide handily…but also dull incredibly quickly, such that a tool would have to be resharpened several times just in the course of butchering a single animal!  Most likely this happened later and many would be brought and used…which explains the profusion of stone tools at archaeological sites.  They were basically single-use items, and since resharpening makes them smaller, they could only be reused so many times.

    I appreciate the additional information. May I ask your tribal affiliation, or is that too personal?


    IHSA especially is a dramatic read, and since it's available for free there's really no reason not to read it.  As far as Gobekli Tepe, it's an extremely interesting site because it's transitional: it seems to indicate that the drive to create cities and monuments predated the domestication (but not the use) of cereal crops.  I have my theories about why this is — but that's an entire book, not a comment.


    You took classes from Frison?  Wow.  What was that like?  I'd love to read some of his textbooks, but $90+ is a bit out of my book budget.

    As far as comforts go, tipis work well if they don't leak or blow over.  Winter is about preparation: if you've got everything repaired and ready over the summer and accumulated a good supply of pemmican, you'll be able to wait it out without too much trouble.  If you didn't or couldn't, well, you'll have problems.  My main question is how the hell they dragged all that stuff around before horses: tipi poles and enough bison hide to cover them has to weigh a lot, not to mention the buffalo robes and blankets.

    I have to admit that indoor plumbing is a nice convenience.  I think that's my least favorite part of winter camping: having to get out of the sleeping bag and go outside in order to pee, whether in the middle of the night or in the morning.


  • jmo

    Oh, you guys forget the more recent hunter gathers that didn’t get pushed out of their way of life until the 1950’s to 1970’s. And according to the sample of archaeology data I went though for a class, lithic tools start out large and get resharpened as many time as needed, A biface becomes a knife, a knife becomes a small biface, a smaller knife, a blade tool, all the way down to discard or even possibly a dart point. Obsidian is all over the rocky mountains in N.America, chert and flint are all thoughout the midwest and plains…thats the extend of my geoghraphic knowledge on that, and when your looking at a paleo population, and you find obsidian in a midwest population, hey they were trading with someone, or walked a really long way. I’m in the midwest, and our paleo populations tell this story. But I’m not an archaeologist, but I play one sometimes in school. My focus is culture.

  • dana pallessen

    my man and i live in wa. state. he hunts all the meat we have and i grow all the nuts, tubers and berries and fruits we eat. hunters gatherers are alive today. even if we lived in a town, it would be possible to live as our bodies require. all that crap that is supposed to be food that is sold in stores, in simply to make monies for the producers. i am a capitalist, but i do not believe people should be making money on ill-health and the deaths that are caused by not eating like your body requires. i also believe one should eat the foods where your gene pool comes from. i am scandinavian. i eat elk and the other plants that grow there. i am QUITE healthy.

  • dana:

    That's wonderful!  Elk is my favorite game meat (of those I've tried).

    And I would strongly argue that our current food production system is NOT capitalist:

    There isn't one grain of anything in the world that is sold in a free market. Not one! The only place you see a free market is in the speeches of politicians. People who are not in the Midwest do not understand that this is a socialist country.” -Dwayne Andreas, ex-CEO of Archer Daniels Midland

    Our current grain-based diet (and nutritional advice) is, I believe, primarily a consequence of our food supply being hijacked by Corporate America through government subsidies that encourage destructive industrial agriculture.  See “Real Food Is Not Fungible.”  If we wonder why people eat crap, the first thing to do is to stop paying others to produce it.  

    Anyway, I'm encouraged to hear that people are living as foragers even in the modern world, and that (as one might expect) the result is health and happiness.  I may ask you more questions via email, if you're disposed to answer.

    Thank you for stopping by.  You're welcome here any time.  Have you read The Gnoll Credo?


  • Daniel Anderson

    Daniel Anderson…

    […]l Keep up the fantastic work , I read few articles on this web site and I con ly[…]…

  • pzo

    I came across this page two months ago, then downloaded the PDF version of IHSI. In a sense, it has changed my intellectual life.

    I took one physical anthropology class way back in 1969. My paleo involvement since 2009 and with the advent of the internet awakened old curiosities.

    IHSI was an intellectual smörgåsbord. I’m still reflecting on the observations and stories.

    Sadly, after reading it I started searching online for other sources. I even went so far as to do something like “vegetarian plains indians,” not sure why. Well, lo and behold, there are vegans out there…with some undefined PhD…..claiming that the buffalo killing years of the plains Indians were a brief period after the introduction of horses. That before horses, they were vegetarian!

    Right, at that latitude and with very little moisture! Lessee, berries and some arrowroot type tubers perhaps? Fueling human critters needing 3-7 thousands of calories a day?

    I find such fantasies part of the vegan “MSU” mindset. Making Stuff/Shit Up. The facts are contrary? No problem! MSU!

  • pzo:

    IHSI absolutely changes your intellectual life.  Having that visceral understanding of just how difficult hunting was, how much thought and skill went into it (in addition to strength and endurance)…and realizing that solving those problems is what our big brains are for.  Nothing more, and nothing less.

    Everything we are, mentally and physically, is because the demands of hunting selected us for it, for millions of years.

    And yes, you're correct.  Veg*ans have carefully constructed an alternate reality for themselves in which they can avoid all the awkward facts which disprove their dogma…just like the “creation scientists”.


  • Walter

    Re: Large Brains for hunting sure and surviving harsh climate, but also for
    living in large groups and even establishing long distance trading.

    I would imagine that HSI would have required a gathering of the clans, which means not only cooperation in the hunt, but an equitable distribution that everyone could agree on and everyone knew would be enforced.

    ‘The jump is in our territory.” “We are providing the leader who are going to
    jump over the cliff to a position of safety — if they execute the maneuver correctly with a thundering herd of bison right behind. And so on, why each group thinks they should get a disproportionate share..

    The politics alone are staggering.

  • Walter:

    The “challenges” of agricultural civilization don’t seem nearly as challenging in this light, do they?


Add Comment Register

Leave a Reply




You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe me to the sporadic yet informative gnolls.org newsletter! (Your email will not be sold or distributed.)